• RRCC signs onto Letter to repeal CFPB Anit-artibration rule

    • Share:
    September 07, 2017
    August 22, 2017
     
    The undersigned are writing to urge you to use the Congressional Review Act to rebuke the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) anti-arbitration rule, S.J. Res. 47.
     
    On July 10th, the CFPB promulgated an anti-arbitration rule that degrades consumer protection, while giving a gift to trial attorneys. Even though this regulation is directed at financial firms, the CFPB’s rule impacts millions of contracts at businesses of all types that the Bureau believes touch consumer finance—even mobile telephone service providers and website operators.  This is an important issue for the business community in Louisiana, as well as the business community nationwide.
     
    This rule is the latest action by the over-reaching and potentially unconstitutional agency. Rather than taking a careful and measured approach that respects integral checks and balances, the CFPB chose to take advantage of their questionable statutory structure to pursue their biased agenda.  In issuing this rule, the CFPB ignored the views of numerous members of Congress, the concerns of another government regulator, as well as the findings of its own foundational study that shows the problems associated with class action litigation. Instead, the CFPB decided to issue a regulation that imposes new burdensome regulations, hurts consumers, and rewards class action lawyers.
     
    Moreover, the rule results from a non-transparent, biased process. To support its rule, the CFPB produced a flawed arbitration study that has been criticized as methodologically unsound by distinguished academics.  In addition, the Bureau’s own data shows that class actions provide little or no benefit to consumers, while providing lucrative paydays to class action attorneys.  For those few consumers who actually receive relief in a class action, the CFPB found that they only get an average of $32 while the class action lawyers bringing the lawsuit receive an average of $1 million in fees.  This is in contrast to arbitration where, according to the same CFPB study, consumers receive almost $5,400 when using arbitration.
     
    We hope that you will support S.J. Res 47 and undo the CFPB’s misguided antiarbitration rule.
     
     Sincerely,
     
    Central Louisiana Regional Chamber of Commerce
    Coalition for Common Sense
    Jefferson Chamber of Commerce
    Louisiana Association of Business and Industry
    Louisiana Bankers Association
    Louisiana Lawsuit Abuse Watch
    River Region Chamber
    Thibodaux Chamber of Commerce 
     
    Contact:
    Chassity McComack, Executive Director